RT @trishgreenhalgh: In this BMJ paper, we presented very limited and indirect empirical evidence (from non-Covid studies) and also *moral…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: In this BMJ paper, we presented very limited and indirect empirical evidence (from non-Covid studies) and also *moral…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: In this BMJ paper, we presented very limited and indirect empirical evidence (from non-Covid studies) and also *moral…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: In this BMJ paper, we presented very limited and indirect empirical evidence (from non-Covid studies) and also *moral…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: In this BMJ paper, we presented very limited and indirect empirical evidence (from non-Covid studies) and also *moral…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: In this BMJ paper, we presented very limited and indirect empirical evidence (from non-Covid studies) and also *moral…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: In this BMJ paper, we presented very limited and indirect empirical evidence (from non-Covid studies) and also *moral…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: In this BMJ paper, we presented very limited and indirect empirical evidence (from non-Covid studies) and also *moral…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: In this BMJ paper, we presented very limited and indirect empirical evidence (from non-Covid studies) and also *moral…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: In this BMJ paper, we presented very limited and indirect empirical evidence (from non-Covid studies) and also *moral…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: In this BMJ paper, we presented very limited and indirect empirical evidence (from non-Covid studies) and also *moral…
In this BMJ paper, we presented very limited and indirect empirical evidence (from non-Covid studies) and also *moral evidence* to argue for the precautionary principle: let’s all wear masks, *just in case*. https://t.co/1moaONWaR1 4/
@psyjg8 @youngsocialistz None of these studies looked at cloth masks or crap imported from China which most people are wearing and actually say on the packets and boxes will not prevent covid ! https://t.co/Sg1PYPyznK
RT @inquisitiveGyn: The #science of why #WearAMask helps reduce 🦠transmission is 👇🏼 @trishgreenhalgh & team. The less #ventilation there…
RT @inquisitiveGyn: The #science of why #WearAMask helps reduce 🦠transmission is 👇🏼 @trishgreenhalgh & team. The less #ventilation there…
RT @inquisitiveGyn: The #science of why #WearAMask helps reduce 🦠transmission is 👇🏼 @trishgreenhalgh & team. The less #ventilation there…
The #science of why #WearAMask helps reduce 🦠transmission is 👇🏼 @trishgreenhalgh & team. The less #ventilation there is ➕the more people ➕higher chance of someone with 🦠the higher the risk. This includes gyms, ✈️➕other indoor settings. https://t.
@Barbara77343552 @LynnBrittney2 From one of the papers that made the case for mask mandates. Double standards wherever it suits. https://t.co/1Z8jMYzMFC https://t.co/x3qsphTvlA
@Bacardibatman @THORPEPARK @Natashadsays @WeWillBeFree82 https://t.co/JLSJKxaDr4 https://t.co/xRSIEHLIrc https://t.co/dplsvxmxAk Published by Yale, BMJ and Nature respectively. 3 highly reputable sources. Here is the relevant Snopes article too from ea
RT @inquisitiveGyn: To understand risk indoors & more scientific evidence on #WearAMask @trishgreenhalgh Can’t beat @trishgreenhalgh very…
To understand risk indoors & more scientific evidence on #WearAMask @trishgreenhalgh Can’t beat @trishgreenhalgh very clear 🚦graphic (based on asymptomatic people👇🏼 https://t.co/v6okBxrq3C Indoors risky. Explain to all your executives, staff, custo
@JuliaHB1 In the same way that there is no evidence for parachute use in skydiving, ‘the precautionary principle states we should sometimes act without definitive evidence, just in case’ https://t.co/RSsPtpzAd3
@quervain_de Die maskenbefürwortenden Wissenschaftler beriefen sich damals nicht auf wissenschaftliche Evidenz (die fehlte), sondern auf ein (politisches) Vorsichtsprinzip. Das BAG griff seine Position also nicht aus der Luft. https://t.co/81NMCVb3X5
@imdavidbryan @DanRather @CoolC04490919 "No purpose whatsoever" is a weird way of saying "preventing covid spread", because the evidence is extremely strong that it does. Don't just make shit up, people will notice. https://t.co/FbOs9TxHdI
@peterwklein @DanRather Oh no! I found another bunch of unscientific people from the british medical journal thinking just because something is facts and evidence its science without consulting Peter from the internet! https://t.co/FbOs9TxHdI
@SaraKeelCube @trishgreenhalgh You may want to read this and some of the other work by Trish and colleagues. https://t.co/mY4g3nv2Lx
RT @2ndNewMoon: Medical journals should decline to promote eccentric and pseudo-scientific ideas, nobody has ever caught Covid_19 whilst jo…
Medical journals should decline to promote eccentric and pseudo-scientific ideas, nobody has ever caught Covid_19 whilst jogging or visiting a beach. @bmj_latest @ClarkeMicah
@trev_mcnamara @EricMillerFink @KVOA ..laboratory-confirmed viral infections were significantly higher in the cloth masks group. https://t.co/nfs3lU0aa7
@ladyinkansas2 @geologyguy @PolitiBunny @CDCDirector Or the BMJ, but whereas the government tends to write assuming that the audience has a reading age of 7, the BMJ is written for adults https://t.co/0efdIsIfSz
@Play_Button_S @Adam_Stratford_ Wow, thats barely coherent. Try, https://t.co/G9ypjB6PqF https://t.co/PH7uJrwnaO https://t.co/NUA58j9YET https://t.co/PH7XfSMsV8 https://t.co/v5Qm5OTF3Q
The BMJ rapid response being misused was screengrabbed by 'red'. The misrepresentation of it was explained by 'white' below: https://t.co/zuPMHzJk7W The original paper is here: https://t.co/wPmnBK3kus https://t.co/5QKPdTGYZp
@RedSnja @SedaOzsry Mevcut durumda hemen hemen bütün otoriteler özellikle kapalı alanlarda herkesin maske takmasını öneriyor hatta bunu zorunlu kılıyorsa bu önerileri takip etmek gerekir. Son olarak da maske kullanılmasını öneren birkaç makalenin linkini
RT @AndrewHewat: Sadly this was published in April 2020 yet here we are in April 2021 still fighting for some states and countries to simpl…
RT @AndrewHewat: Sadly this was published in April 2020 yet here we are in April 2021 still fighting for some states and countries to simpl…
RT @AndrewHewat: Sadly this was published in April 2020 yet here we are in April 2021 still fighting for some states and countries to simpl…
Sadly this was published in April 2020 yet here we are in April 2021 still fighting for some states and countries to simply adopt the precautionary principle. Because #COVIDisAirborne
During global pandemic of an airborne virus, in the absence of evidence, @evidenceCOVID19 guidelines relating to controls to protect HCWs & pts should align with precautionary principle. Read more about precautionary principle here: https://t.co/FJ9
You imitated two narcissistic incompetent idiots-- a hedgefund manager & a physicist. 🤦Congratulations for contributing exactly nothing of actual value to pandemic response! 🏆 https://t.co/RdioTmZ2qq
RT @DrSimonHodes: Just think how many lives you have saved @trishgreenhalgh & how much transmission & Covid you have prevented too So chap…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @DrSimonHodes: Just think how many lives you have saved @trishgreenhalgh & how much transmission & Covid you have prevented too So chap…
Just think how many lives you have saved @trishgreenhalgh & how much transmission & Covid you have prevented too So chapeau to you 👏 History is a great teacher We should learn to not wait for 'evidence' to implement very low risk interventions wi
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
@stacey_rudin You are wrong. As simple as that. Hope you take responsibility for your tweets. https://t.co/7t4yNILvKa
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
En el mar de indolencia con los tapabocas en esta isla, esta buena señora sí que es un tesoro nacional. https://t.co/IByP6NfPBs
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
@RohanChindooroy @Big_Grum @SamuelVimes10 @FraserNelson @carlheneghan An interesting paper here suggests that even with very few studies available, most of the 'evidence' on masks is based purely on observing the precautionary principle. To date, and to th
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
Hace un año la polémica de los tapabocas 😷. Sin duda una de los errores más grandes en la lucha contra el Covid . Siempre nos pareció que tenía sentido igual que la transmisión área “airborne” https://t.co/evqe2VMlBI #Tapabocas #Airborne
principio de precaución. No tener evidencia sólida de beneficio para prevenir outcome grave no es limitante para ejecutar la intervención si sus ef adversos son escasos y el riesgo potencial de no implementarlo es grave. Me recuerda a la discusión de trans
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 1 year ago today, @bmj_latest published our paper arguing for the precautionary principle on facemasks. It took 3 more…