@JosephColasacco @AP_Politics Just 4 of hundreds that are available https://t.co/NQ1gxoRr7T https://t.co/Me0u80pOKd https://t.co/ZvgHBSKDWw https://t.co/slbkhxcThk
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 7 weeks since we published this article in the BMJ arguing for the precautionary principle in relation to masks for th…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 7 weeks since we published this article in the BMJ arguing for the precautionary principle in relation to masks for th…
@hfereid @PolinaM36 @SugarRagdoll @talkRADIO @JuliaHB1 I find this a nice balanced review from.a similar time. https://t.co/FoYd9XNrUK
@workingrich2 @acolner @jimcramer And an early article from the BMJ. https://t.co/2nrkygIbrp
@InterBang @LevitheWilson @DrTomFrieden Your own tweet complains about "without the need for any proof," dishonestly implying there wasn't any. I found the following peer-reviewed scientific articles recommending masks in UNDER A MINUTE: https://t.co/e93g
RT @TerhiTapiainen: Tässä jo keväällä kirjoitettu juttu, jossa avataan hyvin, miksi maskien käyttö on varovaisuusperiaatteen mukaan peruste…
@rkashw @damocrat https://t.co/4GjWaxYJsh Good review this
RT @TerhiTapiainen: Tässä jo keväällä kirjoitettu juttu, jossa avataan hyvin, miksi maskien käyttö on varovaisuusperiaatteen mukaan peruste…
RT @TerhiTapiainen: Tässä jo keväällä kirjoitettu juttu, jossa avataan hyvin, miksi maskien käyttö on varovaisuusperiaatteen mukaan peruste…
RT @TerhiTapiainen: Tässä jo keväällä kirjoitettu juttu, jossa avataan hyvin, miksi maskien käyttö on varovaisuusperiaatteen mukaan peruste…
RT @TerhiTapiainen: Tässä jo keväällä kirjoitettu juttu, jossa avataan hyvin, miksi maskien käyttö on varovaisuusperiaatteen mukaan peruste…
RT @TerhiTapiainen: Tässä jo keväällä kirjoitettu juttu, jossa avataan hyvin, miksi maskien käyttö on varovaisuusperiaatteen mukaan peruste…
Tässä jo keväällä kirjoitettu juttu, jossa avataan hyvin, miksi maskien käyttö on varovaisuusperiaatteen mukaan perusteltua, vaikka täydellinen tutkinusnäyttö puuttuisi. Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis | The BMJ https://t.co/Y0gB3Osy9J
@chris85253 @ANothlich @Markus_Soeder Die überwiegende Mehrheit der Studien dazu belegen einen Effekt... https://t.co/LWOus4aD1z https://t.co/dfkdHUWXcw https://t.co/2jGMUKCStV https://t.co/sRJ59jbWLz https://t.co/7G6SO7Mqzt https://t.co/BDRVgJyYNq https:/
This is a very interesting letter to the BMJ about potential problems of masks for the public. Are they counterproductive? Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis BMJ 2020; 369 doi: https://t.co/hmADAoOJlN(Published 09 April 2020)Cite this a
@BorthwickAndy @dradis22 @catcalledmorris @ianbrown https://t.co/Qupm3C3QZl https://t.co/L8mLJI2Oyy https://t.co/cvz6RQdVRD https://t.co/BwBmUEEfVB https://t.co/TJW8VNTIvI Have a read. Compared with the proper lockdown earlier this year (not to mention &g
@WholesomeMeme BMJ published literature review of the use of face masks. Part of concluding sentence: '...they could have a substantial impact on transmission with a relatively small impact on social and economic life.' https://t.co/6UA8hJcF1J
@rjdekanter @trishgreenhalgh Bingo. This was amongst Prof G's extensive list of publications. (My) paraphrased summary - wear a mask because it's likely better and it will harm far less than what it aims to prevent i.e. Covid19. Dive in https://t.co/rfeAx3
@UKCovid19Stats More on masks by the BMJ: “None of the studies mentioned above tested the makeshift cloth masks that CDC has recommended. To our knowledge, there are no trials of cloth masks in the general public.” https://t.co/WdjTuJXsip
@GaryMLFC1980 @wellboy @SineadOCarroll @thejournal_ie And one from BMJ discussing risk/benefit. https://t.co/upDvTavWf3
RT @T_Inglesby: Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis https://t.co/GrmP47fX7d
@methodsmanmd it was a great idea that some of us at the time, particularly @trishgreenhalgh, had highlighted as an urgent public health priority. we should still do it! https://t.co/6C72e5lPIu
@su_gar_bar Tenho estado a ler a BMJ com atenção sobre o assunto. Este é o artigo que levou o UK a indicar o uso de máscaras https://t.co/BYm7azE2se
@MonacoFerdl @oOloobylouOo @rachelonic @RealDeniseWelch Nice review of available evidence here by Trish Greenhalgh from 9th April. https://t.co/FoYd9XNrUK
@WaldronDara @Vhtempopro @sinead_ryan @ConorAAIreland @rte @JenniferMaguire @carlheneghan From Prof Heneghans colleague https://t.co/25yjzm2g0Q
Wiem, że na twitterze fact checking leży i umiera, dlatego łapcie dwa ładne artykuły naukowe (takie legitne, a nie posty z facebooka od kuzynki brata sąsiadki) o maseczkach bawełnianych 1) https://t.co/d1JveRhcXc 2) https://t.co/HJaFFq8WEV
RT @GMLmusic: A handy peer-reviewed British Medical Journal article from July which summarises the evidence of efficacy of different kinds…
A handy peer-reviewed British Medical Journal article from July which summarises the evidence of efficacy of different kinds of face coverings in reducing virus transmission. Only one type was found to be ineffective (the raised neck scarf/snood style).
@BerylHylton @Dr2NisreenAlwan Why are you sharing a four-year-old article on a website, rather than reading more recently published reviews in journals? Here's one: https://t.co/22n4kZXl1d
@JimSurfero @OhlendorfRyan @TaylorRMarshall Your perspective is wrong because covid travels in droplets. The search for "perfect" evidence may be the enemy of good policy. As far we know, face mask are useful and can help, even if it's a small percentage.
@adamcifu Plenty of literary styles ... “the new abnormal”? “Melodrama” and “Moral philosophy” https://t.co/4D0IXpqtj5 https://t.co/2ncuPfVIWw
@Mellow4orever @rwtravellife @MaximeBernier Nice headline though. The BBC are known for their hard hitting science. https://t.co/Zpl9GZORSs
RT @Lewisdpi: @HeliodorStudio @DuncanRobertBr6 @BriteSponge @Vistaprint Except they do. https://t.co/Uhpo59gcOV
@HeliodorStudio @DuncanRobertBr6 @BriteSponge @Vistaprint Except they do. https://t.co/Uhpo59gcOV
@Avuregh Przecież bawełniane można na luzie prać A jak chcesz badania o ich skuteczności to 1) https://t.co/d1JveRhcXc 2) https://t.co/HJaFFq8WEV Jak wolisz polskie źródła to 3) https://t.co/gh49KKdBr1 4) https://t.co/k7tvv1LoFa Ofc źródeł jest więcej,
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
8/ Mask use and precautionary principle discussed: https://t.co/h875m1s6OT #bced
@theJeremyVine https://t.co/rebiQBP5ur This provides the sensible rationale for wearing masks...
@science_cited @mrmarkdolan Yeah, thought you’d say that, *stifles yawn* I’ll let @trishgreenhalgh the godmother of evidence based medicine so the talking for me https://t.co/x2AFFGu1dS
@Coldhardfacts5 @marnieofficial @mrmarkdolan I was going to say something obnoxious but I’ve been minded that I’m a public face for my Trust. 1. Try educating yourself https://t.co/x2AFFGu1dS without 2. biasing yourself before reading https://t.co/IXPhfL3M
@V5M1000 @BorisJohnson @pritipatel And there is an increasing body of scientific evidence: https://t.co/8pD5cqsqu6
@hugo_psantos @oatila Em "Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis" publicado por Trisha Greenhalgh e coautores, apresenta que o princípio de precaução é válido quando se fala do uso de máscaras, portanto é mais que recomendado o uso Link:http
@Baggie27J @xemma88x @NeilClark66 Data and statistics don't exist fully for this disease yet, and you're VERY selective in the ones you take on board. For example the British Medical Journal did a study released just a couple of days ago which explains ex
@allisonpearson 'She’s the Deputy Chief Medical Officer'. Indeed - worrying isn't it, given the balance of argument? https://t.co/SyJMKjY8Q1
@BrankoDamjanov2 @mrevlje Preberite si https://t.co/tOcyhB74mE ali https://t.co/ieDQl4h43u ali DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3223 in nehajte zavajati javnost z neko logiko in zdravo pametjo.
RT @RErbium: @GladysB we need masks now in Sydney, especially schools starting first thing Monday . Please act! @bradhazzard https://t.co/t…
Ok, let’s end this. Peer reviewed research in well renowned medical journals which advocates the use of public masks: https://t.co/HV9VrRBSpH https://t.co/hL0sN1t5NB Stop being so woke & calling people stupid and twitter, and go read some genuine sc
@GladysB we need masks now in Sydney, especially schools starting first thing Monday . Please act! @bradhazzard
@ellis_muggleton @trishgreenhalgh Would be a good use of precious time and public money to wait for a metà-analysis of RCTs on face mask use? Are we sure we can’t rely on indirect evidence & reasoning for a relatively cheap & acceptable interventio
RT @drjenndowd: @joelondon76 @Dr2NisreenAlwan Costs to wearing masks are low relative to school outbreak/closings (& kids more adaptable th…
@DoubleBogie6 @TomTownson4 @Aaron_Derfel @britjpncdn You clearly don’t read well. Never said “kill” immunity. In the history of infectious disease healthy and asymptomatic people have never been rec to wear masks. Even up till 2 months ago Fauci, CDC, WHO,
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
@Lordgreyofponty @Treeeze @b_brannock @planetjedward You wanted evidence? Here you go: https://t.co/mE5fn6R7ai
@n_thrope @MarcherLord1 @madgame83 @ClarkeMicah There’s plenty, but here’s just one summary: https://t.co/exluUVlAjx
Time to act. Apply Precautionary Principle to protect HCW from #COVID19: update @VicGovDHHS infection control guidance, fit-test N95s, PPE training & spotters, workplace marshalls @VictorianCHO @JennyMikakos @AndrewWilsonCMO @trishgreenhalgh https:/
@GwynCarwardine @marg_leaf @KatharineS23 Great review article on mask wearing from @trishgreenhalgh here: https://t.co/22n4kZXl1d
@VanessaGray999 @Malkster11 @ProfKarolSikora But there are other forms of evidence to suggest it offers some protection to other people. And reassurance. And it doesn't hurt. https://t.co/gZdUWDhEhs
@joelondon76 @Dr2NisreenAlwan Costs to wearing masks are low relative to school outbreak/closings (& kids more adaptable than we give them credit for), so precautionary principle strongly applies IMO: https://t.co/QhHyopawtK @trishgreenhalgh
Irakurri beharrekoa. https://t.co/JkcV10q8gU
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
@Kissekahaaniyan @DC_Faridabad @FBDPolice @WHO @moayush @cmohry They are being ignorant, and it’s a serious problem. https://t.co/bzv0bWryq3
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
Gormless 🤡👇
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…