RT @rafaelprietoc: Sin embargo, en ese mismo artículo en el que se menciona que la evidencia no es tan contudente, se arugmenta que incluso…
RT @rafaelprietoc: Es cierto que si se analiza el uso del cubrebocas desde distintos ángulos, la evidencia puede ser menos contudente. 👇 h…
RT @rafaelprietoc: Sin embargo, en ese mismo artículo en el que se menciona que la evidencia no es tan contudente, se arugmenta que incluso…
@JamesMelville What's going on here James? I really hope these replies are enough to convince you. Even if your still sceptical, please read this advice from Greenhalgh et al: https://t.co/Zd0ENFt2kX Why risk it? https://t.co/YlenWJ4jYc
RT @rafaelprietoc: Sin embargo, en ese mismo artículo en el que se menciona que la evidencia no es tan contudente, se arugmenta que incluso…
RT @rafaelprietoc: Es cierto que si se analiza el uso del cubrebocas desde distintos ángulos, la evidencia puede ser menos contudente. 👇 h…
RT @rafaelprietoc: Sin embargo, en ese mismo artículo en el que se menciona que la evidencia no es tan contudente, se arugmenta que incluso…
RT @rafaelprietoc: Es cierto que si se analiza el uso del cubrebocas desde distintos ángulos, la evidencia puede ser menos contudente. 👇 h…
@FralickMike I think you are being too much of an evidence-based purist. Much like @trishgreenhalgh argued regarding the use of masking during the pandemic, I would suggest you place a greater focus on "external validity" to guide your decision-making: htt
To understand the debate on cloth masks, this is a good read from APRIL. It articulates by personal view well - ie the "precautionary principle". It also covers opposing arguments and a key reminder: masks MUST be properly used WITH social distance. /2 ht
@EasySimon @FaheemWyne Here’s a much better review in the BMJ: https://t.co/22n4kZXl1d
@thisisamy_ Masks may have some benefit, but the evidence is marginal, we don’t need aggressive vigilante behaviour - that just alienates people. The second bit is a ridiculous straw man argument. https://t.co/9QkPGdLdlF
@pchemstud @WolfmannotJack Brilliant demonstrations, Tom! 👍🙂 Could you try 2 & 3 layers of cloth (cotton, or 2 cotton + 1 paper towel)? This is 'urgently needed'*! [*ref: https://t.co/oAsqO2zbJp para 19, just after '(box 1)']
@brandonjsmith5 It's hard to be childish, wrong, threatening and politically naive all in one FB post, but there it is. Here's the BMJ review of the evidence. https://t.co/TAHDNoiYI0
@MUFCNW3427 @AndreaVasey67 @DrRanj @SoniaPoulton It is false to state that masks “have never ever been recommended to stop the spread of a virus” Read this BMJ paper among others. https://t.co/zf8KmP2uU6
@DavidLlWilliams @LuluBowen1 @nat_outnumbered @BreesAnna @itvnews @GMB @thismorning @simondolan The purpose of universal masking is to stop you from unknowingly spreading it (not stop you getting it). There is evidence that masks work. https://t.co/FoI1TRr
RT @ACSQHC: Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis https://t.co/Up0efV0LQG
@TraderFTW @TopThird https://t.co/0bwCmOgMIM particularly for the five studies cited in the introduction.
@WEschenbach A recent review of the evidence that comes to a different conclusion, with the reasons why they do so: https://t.co/8H9eEQG121
@archsom Anywhere? Or would you differentiate? Home made as good as commercial ones? Any evidence to support these? I know of this from @trishgreenhalgh and colleagues https://t.co/mBhc1pF0SK
@leannemac4 @KeithAn50223675 @WhiteAngelalynn @ng_adm Want me to link them again? Maybe you can do the same for you flu deaths statistic you made up? https://t.co/WSUWMVbhVJ
@KeithAn50223675 @WhiteAngelalynn @ng_adm @leannemac4 I already did. https://t.co/WSUWMVbhVJ
RT @ACSQHC: Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis https://t.co/Up0efV0LQG
@forgues_michel @MeanwhileinCana Sure it does. But consensus is always subject to new evidence. There is a 'consensus' on climate change and evolution. You might find the following links interesting: https://t.co/tMDdOprJe4 https://t.co/4XkaD5Go14
RT @ACSQHC: Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis https://t.co/Up0efV0LQG
@SylviaDeeDee @TheShovel @trishgreenhalgh rapid summary of evidence on mask use and its interpretation and application to Coronavirus spread. Precautionary principle applies here. https://t.co/3pSQJ3dEAM
Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis https://t.co/Up0efV0LQG
@april97F @ohiocanbegreat @middleroadist @ksorbs So do you pick and choose which "scientists" you believe? There are many studies which also state that wearing a mask works. https://t.co/LiqMtO4vB5
#BBCNews The “science” didn’t change, the acceptance did #Facemasks https://t.co/TO3Fkh3OEk
@remyngol Je préfère m’en tenir aux évidences scientifiques Le port des masques chirurgicaux ou en tissues constitue une barrière importante dans la dissipation des gouttelettes dans l’air ambiant et de ce fait réduit la contagiosité de la covid-19👇🏽👇🏽 ht
RT @janehhodgkinson: @9NewsAUS "The precautionary principle states we should sometimes act without definitive evidence, just in case...Even…
@9NewsAUS "The precautionary principle states we should sometimes act without definitive evidence, just in case...Even limited protection could prevent some transmission of covid-19 and save lives..." https://t.co/M77BaexS5M
@camillalong British Medical Journal?? https://t.co/lFoCAvqzug
@taxbod It’s been a long slog in the UK to get this far. With this publication mask wearing during the weekly shop became my norm. @trishgreenhalgh https://t.co/FmpTlLUwuq
@camillalong You want evidence? Try this https://t.co/33KxEjKwNx
@camillalong all this chat about #masksnitch and #MaskNazi is really unhelpful. Mixed messages from #UKGovernment don’t help either. #COVID19 is a serious threat to the health & wellbeing of people as well as the #economy. To avoid #lockdownuk please #
@camillalong Your perception of a lack of evidence doesn't mean they don't work. Besides, that definitely doesn't equate to not needing to wear a mask: If it could make a difference for some people, shouldn't you? https://t.co/RBFHkYn5dV
Common sense should always win out over ginned up fear.
@ksorbs @AdamBaldwin I’m in the UK, I’ve lost an uncle to this virus, 2 of my cousins have had it. I was adviced to wear a mask by 4 seperate medical professionals I know, and have been since March. My fear is passing this bloody thing onto other people.
@donilo252525 @SBSNews There have actually been No scientific studies as to covid vs masks either way. There has been no time so the use has been precautionary here is arguably the best medical advice: https://t.co/QyvjMaZ3Qb
@ScottAdamsSays I have see both and even a Bmj report giving pros and cons! https://t.co/kYtKPbnN6q
@Truth_shall_win No worries. Since listening to experts in the field and reading some of the recent work on the issue. For example: https://t.co/I6W3ATEntk
@ArthurWeint Um artigo um pouco mais atualizado para seu estudo caro ministro. https://t.co/K1rKjVMzeR
@BroadyNate @realDonaldTrump I question your TRUTH as the TRUTH as science is NOT settled. At this point statements that masks prevent the spread is anecdotal and not backed up by scientific research. https://t.co/dxyLSYwyEW
RT @Nishaobgyn: Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis Published 9.4.20 @bmj_latest Mandated in Melbourne ...crickets #Ma…
@gored37 @GHogChi @SethMacFarlane There was a RCT some years back looking at masks in clinical setting which found cloth masks were the least effective. It was cut into pieces by Trisha Greenhalgh - she pointed out as there was no true control arm (no mask
(4/7) Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis➡️https://t.co/wZJ70agMOV
@slan19467036 @ArthurWeint Achei esse tbm. https://t.co/687qxDnM1n
"The evidence base on the efficacy and acceptability of the different types of face mask in preventing respiratory infections during epidemics is sparse and contested." https://t.co/cmuZSqGq7H
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
@benoitm_mtl @VoisinSt @S_EFortin C'est drôle, je fais une simple recherche sur Scholar, les dix premiers articles qui me sortent : tous en faveur du masque. https://t.co/eUjRqVQ7Jp ou https://t.co/HFy1wWFM7E ou https://t.co/4uEZur6Khi ou https://t.co/FVM
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
Thank you for all you have done, Trisha, by arguing in favour of face-coverings and face-masks, & in support of the precautionary principle, the use of evidence & learning from international experience. The abuse you have received for speaking the
@SomePithyName @JGForsyth Yeah; so why are people listening to the mainstream narrative from people they don’t believe or trust, rather than looking into things. And centralisation is ridiculous. One rule does not fit all. The BMJ agree: https://t.co/WdjT
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @Nishaobgyn: Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis Published 9.4.20 @bmj_latest Mandated in Melbourne ...crickets #Ma…
Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis Published 9.4.20 @bmj_latest Mandated in Melbourne ...crickets #MaskUpMelbourne #MasksSaveLives https://t.co/7zkxU2UNS7
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
"an immune, naive population" is not just a medical description but the inscription on the Tomb of the Unknowing Briton 2016-2020.
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
@AdamBaldwin @Fritz1204 British medical journal. I have been advised by 4 medical professionals in 3 countries to wear a mask back in March. https://t.co/O2UPIYghf2
@Telegraph Stick your masks you treacherous fucks. Argue this: https://t.co/WdjTuJXsip
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…
RT @trishgreenhalgh: 9th April 2020: We argued for the precautionary principle on face coverings, because "covid-19 is a serious illness…