RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
RT @ClarkeMicah: I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental…
I've taken a look at them @vaughandavies , usual causality-free pseudoscience resting on weak verbs, no hard experimental work. Wear a muzzle if you want. But don't try to compel others on such a feeble basis.
@MsMol69 @CaptainPickle2 @BreesAnna Some in approx order of readability: https://t.co/mRFrdKsSni https://t.co/EIiFY3iaI3 https://t.co/1FOqkaBvPK Journal of Infection 81(1): 107-114 Types of covering covered in: https://t.co/q3PedYoz3T & https://t.c
@susanmsmith @cebm @carlheneghan @ZeroCOVIDIsland As for masks, he's right that there are no RCTs of masks to prevent spread. There is a modest hillock of observational, ecological, and laboratory evidence that says they probably work to protect others, fr
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
RT @PabloFuente: #COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020…
#COVID19 22) Meta-análisis: " Mascarillas para el público durante la crisis del Covid-19," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020, BMJ: https://t.co/PJICtULJ0G
@mp3michael @joshelman Irrespective of the mixed studies, the most thoughtful overall approach from a policy perspective is discussed here (and I'd encourage you to read this start to finish, as it is measured and balanced, and takes seriously many of the
@TrustTruth5 A proper scienceitific review from a proper science journal: https://t.co/Y57qwad03L
@PoniSoulja @Dude76West @cheolavega @JSL_TORNOK @ghiamia73 @davenewworld_2 @milehighresists No one ever said the masks were 100% effective. They may only be minimally effective. It's all about reducing risk. https://t.co/ZFcWXwlNbA https://t.co/BifYjEXM8C
@ALancashirelad Aye, that famously fake media source, the British Medical Journal: https://t.co/siY6UidBKf
@youcouldtravel Sigh. You do know I'm a qualified professional in this field right? You know of the precautionary principle? That there is no evidence they are effective, go against all IPC best practice & actually SPREAD more germs because the public
Excellent advice for mask wearing
https://t.co/yZVERHaH9w Trisha Greenhalgh and colleagues argue that it is time to apply the precautionary principle https://t.co/vsA9caeY24 Rapid Response: Covid-19: important potential side effects of wearing face masks https://t.co/dOuhDPpI4U
https://t.co/6vfzGJjFVk Trisha Greenhalgh and colleagues argue that it is time to apply the precautionary principle https://t.co/vsA9caeY24 Rapid Response: Covid-19: important potential side effects of wearing face masks https://t.co/dOuhDPpI4U
@MissTinSC @michaelbeatty3 @angie20172 @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/C6BQfUYGU1 Within you’ll find a list of peer reviewed reviews.
@SoDakMarko This is as level-headed as I’ve seen, when it comes to a review of the literature. I’m turned off by some of the editorializing, but they do not appear to be misrepresenting the facts. Just some (minor) difference of opinion. https://t.co/ey0
@itankenemine Jiji mijita. Yo no busco informacion científica en CAJAS. Te dejo un artículo serio. No es mi culpa si no lo entiendes. https://t.co/LRDmmuV2sS
@BreesAnna
@Unlocked_UK_ @BreesAnna @ProfKarolSikora Masks are simple, cheap, and potentially effective. We believe they could have a substantial impact on transmission with a relatively small impact on social and economic life. https://t.co/EVgloU6TQ9
@CDCDirector "NO STUDIES HAVE TESTED MAKESHIFT CLOTH MASKS THAT THE CDC RECOMMENDS." "TO OUR KNOWLEDGE, THERE ARE NO TRIALS OF CLOTH MASKS IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC." https://t.co/vsA9caeY24 https://t.co/7yfWNKa3zM
@BrianV1981 @NotKaren15 @DakilaOne @richardursomd @AlastairMcA30 Says you, the expert. See I can do it too. https://t.co/Zpl9GZORSs
a related bonus personal opinion on communicating recommendations in the face of uncertain evidence: use the precautionary principle. see this @trishgreenhalgh essay from April, both ahead of its time and already too late: https://t.co/6C72e5DqA2 https://
@Darkfly_Qc @mmia2 Bof, je suis sceptique : 30 sec, et c'est bon https://t.co/5VbhUph3Fc
RT @rcofinof: @maytegrc 7. Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis de T.G de nuevo https://t.co/ycKfZtdbfP Y una pre-print no…
@Inteleon100 @GovEvers https://t.co/1YGACEscUD Cited 256 times https://t.co/JDz685jQEA Cited 130 times https://t.co/VUuawOc0oU Cited 78 times https://t.co/wfEPERQ4pM Cited 82 times https://t.co/O5SFsbrFpI Cited 40 times Please take your pick.
@DGHUGH99 @ColdSnap77 @marty_walsh @CityOfBoston @TheOnion Maybe instead of reading a one paragraph meme that so spreading through the antimask flock you should do your own research and read the entire paper https://t.co/IH7IctqsLz
@maytegrc 7. Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis de T.G de nuevo https://t.co/ycKfZtdbfP Y una pre-print no revisada todavía por pares que hay que leer por tanto con cuidado https://t.co/rwIWHnd5gI
@aantonop Trish greenhalgh on face masks masks https://t.co/qko0GVLXbb Trish greenhalagh review of face masks evidence https://t.co/wSWSgFL8Qv
for mask protection from spreading or getting Covid-19 there is no irrefutable evidence, but here is a well-informed and comprehensive review. https://t.co/jgpnT5aWBi @trishgreenhalgh You can decide how persuasive it is.
@LT_FM @NPR Also, the BMJ, like the JAMA, now recommends the wearing of masks: https://t.co/Oj4eryhNVT. https://t.co/WvjoAbI2ie
@ClarkeMicah As ever, @ClarkeMicah you choose to select evidence that only supports your view. Try reading the ongoing debate. https://t.co/SAG4Joz72a https://t.co/crggMWo3Yd https://t.co/dLVJvLLvbs And there's loads more.
@frcu88 @Alberto17017619 @ADANMSL @guantesrock @AdrianAAT13 @BruceJulis @la_grenitas @ElsevierConnect @nature Eso meramente opinión del autor, no está respaldada por ningún artículo que se mencione en la bibliografía, así que su validez es baja. Aquí te d
@JefK20 @PanTransHuman Also regarding the last point: A quick search on any academic database comes up with loads of peer reviewed articles on the effectiveness of wearing masks to reduce COVID risk https://t.co/PMXrAUNKbH https://t.co/9XSi8JkjeX
RT @nuanceORDEATH: 21/70 META: "Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis," Greenhalgh et al., April 9 2020, BMJ: https://t.co/4…
@Soc_cerman @alliekeith @gbizz96 @davidkurten Hi! I have shared some of this with you before - e.g. Greenhalgh et al (see https://t.co/v9PP8IM3Ld) - which was written in response to Martin et al (see https://t.co/b4hnvZKwtb) - which was in response to a pr
@Hari89886353 @UberFacts Similarly, see Greenhalgh et al. (2020) who argue in favour of the precautionary principle - "we have little to lose and potentially something to gain". https://t.co/krtuhGUrBh
@Fur1ousApollo @elainebeaulieu2 @Fox_Claire No, the advice of the scientists is to wear masks https://t.co/gFfJ2Ife3x
@thescousetory @Fox_Claire Anyone who thinks science doesn't demonstrate benefits of mask wearing for reducing transmission of COVID hasn't bothered to read the science https://t.co/gFfJ2Ife3x
@Hannah_KiwiRun @MRSS11224611 @Fox_Claire @trishgreenhalgh See this paper: https://t.co/gFfJ2Ife3x
@aantonop Trish greenhalgh on face masks masks https://t.co/qko0GVLXbb Trish greenhalagh review of face masks evidence https://t.co/wSWSgFL8Qv
@KeithAn50223675 @tim4eu @JamesDelingpole Similarly, see Greenhalgh et al. (2020) who argue in favour of the precautionary principle - "we have little to lose and potentially something to gain". https://t.co/krtuhGUrBh
RT @shawnsharif: Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis, Trish Greenhalgh et al. https://t.co/15LOJzHpbf
Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis, Trish Greenhalgh et al. https://t.co/15LOJzHpbf
RT @rafaelprietoc: Sin embargo, en ese mismo artículo en el que se menciona que la evidencia no es tan contudente, se arugmenta que incluso…
RT @rafaelprietoc: Es cierto que si se analiza el uso del cubrebocas desde distintos ángulos, la evidencia puede ser menos contudente. 👇 h…
RT @rafaelprietoc: Sin embargo, en ese mismo artículo en el que se menciona que la evidencia no es tan contudente, se arugmenta que incluso…
RT @rafaelprietoc: Es cierto que si se analiza el uso del cubrebocas desde distintos ángulos, la evidencia puede ser menos contudente. 👇 h…
@ChristineBrett8 @toadmeister Yes, there is. This paper is particularly useful - https://t.co/dUZcjXkQjB
@SoupyTwists @Addyboombatty @RealBrocialism @MartinRemains @justinmadders I’m ignoring evidence? Huh. https://t.co/TtazTsMKMh https://t.co/fjAnWhBZ7s
Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis BMJ 2020; 369 doi: https://t.co/39ezbuVgIB "NO STUDIES HAVE TESTED MAKESHIFT CLOTH MASKS THAT THE CDC RECOMMENDS." "TO OUR KNOWLEDGE, THERE ARE NO TRIALS OF CLOTH MASKS IN THE GENERAL PUBLIC."
Better safe than sorry. #COVID https://t.co/swsdgKx40L
RT @rafaelprietoc: Sin embargo, en ese mismo artículo en el que se menciona que la evidencia no es tan contudente, se arugmenta que incluso…